Texas Faith: In love and marriage, do different faiths really matter in America?

      Comments Off on Texas Faith: In love and marriage, do different faiths really matter in America?
http://interfaithmarriages.blogspot.com/

When a couple is deeply committed to marry, they go ahead and get
married anyway without the ceremony due to religious restrictions, but
they sorely miss out on the integral part of their tradition they grew
up with; a religious cultural wedding. There is good news for such
couples now; an interfaith wedding.


As a Pluralist, I am blessed
to have performed numerous weddings for couples in their own religious
traditions like the Hindu-Christian, Muslim-Jain, Jewish-Christian,
Muslim-Hindu and other combinations. We can highlight the beautiful
wisdom of each faith as a part of the sermon to bring a sense of
completeness to their wedding.

Texas Faith: In love and marriage, do different faiths really matter in America?

By Rudolph Bush
rbush@dallasnews.com
10:47 am on June 10, 2014 | Permalink

Recently, I attended the beautiful wedding of two friends, one from a Jewish family and one from a Christian family. The ceremony largely followed the Jewish tradition with occasional mention of the bride’s Christian upbringing.

I began to wonder, witnessing this blending of two people into one couple bound under God, what place separate faiths really serve in our society. If we are honest, there is no justifying the fundamental difference in belief between Christians and Jews or the other major faiths. But in cases like these, it is our cultural homogeneity that is more important than the tenets of our faith.

Given that, what does faith really mean in circumstances like these? Is faith or religion simply ceremonial? Or are we overcoming divisions in the name of something greater – that is – love?

Read our panelists’ responses below.

MIKE GHOUSE, President, Foundation for Pluralism and speaker on interfaith matters, Dallas

Religions don’t marry, but people do, and what brings them together in the first place is a shared interest, evolved out of living their daily life at work, school, gym, bars, conferences and even the place of worship, indeed, that is what connects them.

These couples must be admired by one and all. In an increasingly egocentric world, when people have difficulty in getting along, they are setting a new standard of respecting the otherness of others (defined as Pluralism).

It is disappointing to many couples, that their clergy or the parents insist on the other person to convert to their faith tradition, some do, and some fake it and some are not even comfortable with the idea.

When a couple is deeply committed to marry, they go ahead and get married anyway without the ceremony due to religious restrictions, but they sorely miss out on the integral part of their tradition they grew up with; a religious cultural wedding. There is good news for such couples now; an interfaith wedding.

As a Pluralist, I am blessed to have performed numerous weddings for couples in their own religious traditions like the Hindu-Christian, Muslim-Jain, Jewish-Christian, Muslim-Hindu and other combinations. We can highlight the beautiful wisdom of each faith as a part of the sermon to bring a sense of completeness to their wedding.

There is a cautionary side of the interfaith marriage, as Naomi Schaefer Riley reports in her book, How Interfaith Marriage is Transforming America, “The growing number of interfaith couples don’t know what they’re getting into. Interfaith couples tend to marry without thinking through the practical implications of their religious differences. They assume that because they are decent and tolerant people … they will not encounter difficulties being married to someone of another faith.” She insists, “But faith is a tricky thing and it sneaks up on people,” especially at significant moments when the pull of old loyalties supposedly outgrown reasserts itself. “The death of a loved one, the birth of a child, the loss of a job, a move to a new city — all of these things can give people a sense of religious longing, a desire to return to the faith of their childhood.”

One must be fully secure in himself or herself to learn to accept each other’s uniqueness, then conflicts fade and solutions emerge.

To read the other panelists, go to Dallas Morning news at
http://dallasmorningviewsblog.dallasnews.com/2014/06/texas-faith-in-love-and-marriage-do-different-faiths-really-matter-in-america.html/#more-40530……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Mike Ghouse is a speaker, thinker and a
writer on pluralism, politics, peace, Islam, Israel, India, interfaith, and cohesion at work
place. He is committed to building a Cohesive America and offers
pluralistic solutions on issues of the day at www.TheGhousediary.com. He believes in
Standing up for others
and a book with the same title is coming up. Mike has a strong presence on
national and local TV, Radio and Print Media. He is a frequent guest on Sean Hannity show on
Fox TV, and a commentator on national radio networks, he contributes weekly to
the Texas Faith Column at Dallas
Morning News
; fortnightly at Huffington post; and
several other periodicals across the world. His personal site www.MikeGhouse.net indexes all his work
through many links.

Shashi Tharoor and Mike Ghouse on Narendra Modi at Huffington Post

      Comments Off on Shashi Tharoor and Mike Ghouse on Narendra Modi at Huffington Post

Is there an Indian who does not want to hear the following
statements from his national leader? 
“125 Crore (1.25 Billion) Indians are my family” – “Sab Ka Sath sab Ka
Vikas: everyone together, prosperity for all” – “I will not fall into the trap
of looking at Muslim or Christian colors, but see everyone as my fellow Indian”
– “Whether you voted for me or not, I am your Prime Minister” – “No one needs
to fear the other” – Let’s build toilets before we build temples” and many such
positive upbeat statements from Mr. Narendra Modi.

When Tharoor and I heard the above statements in a variety
of expressions, we understood its depth and praised it. Even if he did not mean
it, let the man define himself and live up to it. He has a reputation for
discipline and in less than ten days, he has straightened the Parliamentary
offices – if they know Modi is making the rounds, they clean up the offices and
get their acts together. After all, Modi has quoted Mahatma Gandhi “we are the
trustees of people” and we have to live up to it.

The accusations leveled against me and Tharoor is that we have changed,
we did not!
It is actually Modi ……….. Continued at Huffington Post – to be posted before Monday at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-ghouse/
 
 
References:

Links provided after each bullet and additional links, where you can link this as article.

“125 Crore [1.25 billion] Indians are my family.”
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/news/Full-text-of-Narendra-Modis-speech-in-Central-Hall-of-Parliament/articleshow/35420762.cms

   
“Sab Ka Sath sab Ka Vikas: Everyone together, prosperity for all.”
http://www.narendramodi.in/sabka-saath-sabka-vikas-a-synopsis-of-11-years-of-shri-narendra-modi-in-gujarat-as-the-cm/

“I will not fall into the trap of looking at Muslim or Christian colors, but see everyone as my fellow Indian.”
http://www.ndtv.com/elections/article/election-2014/in-message-to-muslims-narendra-modi-says-will-reach-out-to-all-512357

“Whether you voted for me or not, I am your prime minister.”
https://news.yahoo.com/modi-condemns-anti-muslim-remarks-colleagues-defiant-112857867–business.html

“No one needs to fear the other.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/17/world/asia/india-muslims-modi.html?_r=0

“Let’s build toilets before we build temples.”
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Build-toilets-first-and-temples-later-Narendra-Modi-says/articleshow/23422631.cms 
 
Gandhi Quote
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PQlAJgf8Tc#t=522

 
Mike Ghouse is Public Speaker,
thinker and an author commited to building cohesive societies, and offers
pluralistic solutions on issues of the day. Everything about him is at
MikeGhouse.net and many links to media, websites and blogs.

Why Is It So Hard To Convert to Judaism?

      Comments Off on Why Is It So Hard To Convert to Judaism?

RELIGIOUS CONVERSIONS AND PLURALISM

URL – http://foundationforpluralism.blogspot.com/2014/06/why-is-it-so-hard-to-convert-to-judaism.html

I am much closer to a reformed Jew than the orthodox.  No,
I am not Jewish,  I am a Muslim. But on the issue of conversion I am in
tune with the Orthodox Jews – I have chased many people away seeking to
convert to Islam, I asked them to spend that time in learning about
their own faith, something they are familiar with and at times have
shared the wisdom of their religion.

Being an Atheist for half of
my life, I chose Islam, not because it is superior, but because I was
familiar with it and it suited my belief in pluralism.  If not, any
faith would have been a good vehicle for social living in harmony. By
the way Judaism, Islam and Hinduism are closer to Atheism – God is not a
being or a thing in these faiths and you cannot give an acceptable
image either. While Hinduism sees it in many forms, Islam and Judaism null
it out.

Anyone who boasts that his religion is superior, better,
oldest, wisest, scientific, logical etc, has not really understood his
or her religion. Religion is about humility that builds bridges,
mitigates conflicts and nurtures goodwill. To claim any hint of
superiority is killing the essence of religion- arrogance is the mother
of all conflicts and religion is about peace and not conflicts. Personally one
should have the freedom to eat, drink, wear or believe whatever one
wants, however, I don’t see the need for conversion, there is nothing
wrong with the religion you believe in, it works for you, its like your
mother. But if you want change, you should go for whatever religion suits you without any guilt or restrictions.
This is my response to an article, “Why Is It So Hard To Convert to Judaism?”

If you look to religion from Mr. Spock’s perspective,
you see religion as an instrument to bring “togetherness” within an
individual and with what surrounds him or her – life and matter.  All
religions serve the same purpose.

None of the Masters wanted to
create a group to be against the other, all they were interested was in
creating societies where no individual had to live in fear of
the other.  They wanted everyone to subscribe to the idea of social
harmony and respecting life of the other as their own.

Every one
of them from Zoroaster, Moses, Confucius, Krishna, Buddha, Mahavira,
Jesus, Muhammad, Nanak, Bahaullah, umpteen Shamans in native traditions
to the peace makers like Gandhi, MLK and others wanted to build cohesive
societies. And NONE of them wanted any one to convert against
something, but rather to be the inclusive individual.

Very few of
us have seriously questioned the need to convert, or even questioned
the veracity of the claims that Jesus or Muhammad wanted people to
convert – convert to a good human or specific political group that is
opposed to others?  In another decade, more of us will be questioning,
and Religion would become a beautiful choice for personal consumption
rather than political instrument to control others.

As Cosgrove
said, “First Hillel converts, and then Hillel teaches. First you join
and then, once you are a vested member, you figure out what it is all
about.” Indeed, Muslims have made conversion easy – just say that you
believe in one God and Muhammad (pbuh) is his prophet. Then comes
learning about Islam and living a life of Islam. Most people get their
religion rights, a few don’t,  and make a mess for others.

What amazes me
with all religions is – they have forced religion into outwardly
appearances and names. That is the first thing a convert is looking for;
how do I look Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Christian or whatever.  I wish we
all redefine us in terms of character reflection rather than caps,
clothes, beards and wears. 

We have reduced religion into “appearance” rather than imbuing its essence that is to make you a contented happy being.

When
I go into a place of worship, and I have been to every place, what I
see is the devotion of the individual, and not the physical movements,
it is the humility that permeates him or her and not the show off. It is
the same devotion expressed in so many different ways.

Lastly, I
raised my kids with an open mind – they have been to most places of
worship. I did not want them to be bigots when they grow up.

At
each place of worship, my little girl would quietly nudge and ask,
“Dad, what are they saying?” – for a six year old, I learned to simplify
it, “Sweetie, they are appreciating God for providing food, clothing,
home and a world to live, and thanking him for good parents, family and
friends. ” In all honesty, you cannot translate anything other than
this, no matter where you go.

One day, we were in the midst of
Bhajans (chanting hymns) sitting crossed legged on the floor in the
Hindu temple.  When she nudged me, I knew what was coming … that
beautiful face was admiringly looking into my eyes… and like a cassette
player plays when the button is pushed, I said. “Sweetie, they are….”

Then what came was a big surprise of my life. She jumped up, raised her
hands, and said, “Gee Dad, it is so cool that God can be worshiped in so
many ways.”

Mike Ghouse  is Public Speaker, thinker and an author committed to building
cohesive societies, and offers pluralistic solutions on issues of the day.
Everything about him is at MikeGhouse.net and many links to media, websites and
blogs.

# # #
Why Is It So Hard To Convert to Judaism?

Editorial
Courtesy: The Jewish Daily Forward

Published June 02, 2014, issue of June 06, 2014.

In February 2013, Rabbi Elliot Cosgrove of Park Avenue Synagogue, as fancy and important a place as its name suggests, floated an intriguing idea. In a sermon to his congregation on Manhattan’s Upper East Side, Cosgrove urged the Conservative movement, his movement, to become much, much more welcoming to anyone interested in converting to Judaism.

He cited the famous talmudic story of the would-be-convert who approaches two dueling rabbis, Shammai and Hillel, asking to learn the entire Torah on one foot. Shammai dismissively pushes the man away. Hillel, instead, converts him immediately, teaching him that the Torah’s central message is: “That which is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow. The rest is commentary. Go and learn.”

“The order of events is often missed, but it is instructive for us today,” Cosgrove said in his sermon. “First Hillel converts, and then Hillel teaches. First you join and then, once you are a vested member, you figure out what it is all about.”
Related

    Don’t Believe in God? Come Aboard!
    Finding God in the Other
    Man in Search of God

Cosgrove’s sermon created a stir, and he repeated his proposal before various meetings and conventions during the past year. He’s not the only one to suggest that conversion become simpler, quicker, cheaper and way more welcoming. There’s even a discussion about this in the latest edition of the Conservative movement’s official magazine.

Enough talk. Time to do something.

We who care about sustaining the future of the modern Jewish family, who want to confront the tide of assimilation and disengagement with positive, affirming Jewish values, or who simply like being Jews and want to pass that along, need to radically rethink conversion. Instead of playing hard-to-get, or acting as if Jews are part of a club with admission standards higher than Harvard Law School, we need to open our arms, drop our reluctance, lower the barriers and not just welcome converts to join our synagogues. We need to encourage people to become Jews, in their way, in their time — especially when marriage and child rearing are involved.

“Some people don’t talk about money or sex. Jews don’t talk about conversion,” notes Rabbi Joy Levitt, executive director of the JCC in Manhattan, who has thought a lot about this issue. “I don’t understand why. I think it’s a wonderful thing. I have a lot of confidence in the tradition’s ability to work its magic on people.”

Think this isn’t a problem? Read the latest issue of Voices of Conservative/Masorti Judaism, which to its credit published a couple of pointed articles criticizing the status quo. “I think it’s hard for anyone who grew up Jewish to understand how intimidating — how downright scary — it can be for a non-Jew to set foot in a synagogue or make an appointment with a rabbi to discuss conversion,” writes Darcy R. Fryer, a historian and teacher who converted in 1998.

The title of her story, “Too Long a Wait,” suggests one of the barriers placed before the convert. Fryer studied for 14 months; many rabbis require at least a year, ostensibly to experience the annual Jewish calendar. There’s the cost — hundreds, if not thousands of dollars, in conversion classes. There’s the tradition of turning away a would-be convert three times, just to test her resolve and dedication.

Why stretch out what is essentially an emotional decision? As Fryer writes, “most of my figuring out how to live as a Jew came after I converted, just as couples figure out how to be married after they get married and parents how to parent after they have children.”

Even the words we use stigmatize. We refer to a person as a “convert” rather than a “Jew.” We give this new Jew a Hebrew name affixed with “son of Abraham and Sarah” rather than with his (presumably) non-Jewish parents. When that name is read aloud in synagogue, he is labeled. And we wonder why the process can be alienating.

As Levitt says, “We should use convert as a verb, not a noun.”

There is, let’s be honest, an underlying hypocrisy here: We ask more of the convert than we do of the Jew by birth. That’s especially true as the number of Jews “of no religion” increases and the intermarriage rate soars for the non-Orthodox, two key findings of last year’s Pew Research Center’s survey of American Jews. We don’t ask Jews by birth to study for a proscribed time, to pass a test, to prove themselves. All you need is one Jewish parent and little else in your life to qualify for a free trip to Israel with Taglit-Birthright.

For centuries, there was good reason for Jews to hold tight to the clan and avoid even the appearance of proselytizing, lest they antagonize their neighbors and the powers-that-be. But the situation is reversed now. Our reticence to promote ourselves and our reluctance to welcome newcomers is the exact opposite of what’s expected in the digital age.

Jonah Peretti, founder and CEO of Buzzfeed, one of the nation’s fastest-growing media companies, spoke to a media summit last year and used a comparison of Mormons and Jews to make a point about the nature of social interaction that is relevant here.

“There was one Mormon for every 10 Jews [in 1950]. Now there are more Mormons in the world than Jews. Why is that?” Peretti asked. It’s not because Mormonism is a higher-quality religion than Judaism. “The real reason is that Mormons actually focus half of their time on practicing their religion and the other half of their time on how to spread their religion,” he said. “The idea matters but so does the mechanism for spreading the idea.”

We don’t suggest that Jews don Mitt Romney-like suits and skinny ties and go around spreading the Gospel for a year or two. But somehow we have to harness the passion, dedication, indeed the confidence that Mormons exude and overcome our reluctance to share our faith and culture with anyone the least bit interested in joining us.

“Everybody wants their lives to be more meaningful,” Levitt observes. “We have what to offer here.”

This is a campaign tailor-made for the Conservative movement. Orthodoxy clings to the traditional notion that years of study and observance must precede conversion. (And that’s in America. The Israeli rabbinate sets the bar impossibly, cruelly high.) The Reform movement has little incentive, given its embrace of patrilineal descent and the increasing willingness of its rabbis to perform interfaith marriages.

But Conservative Jews could be to the modern world what Chabad-Lubavitch is to the traditional: a center of exuberant outreach. Such an embrace could also help Conservatives with the central paradox of their attitudes toward intermarriage: Conservative rabbis may not perform, or even attend, an interfaith marriage, and yet expect that the new couple will somehow gravitate toward their synagogues. This may be a principled stand, but it’s not a sustainable one.

Ironically, in a series of videos released by the Jewish Theological Seminary for the upcoming holiday of Shavuot, several Conservative scholars cited talmudic teachings emphasizing the need for straightforward and undemanding conversion.

We should have no fear of diluting Judaism by making conversion easier. It is a radical transformation of identity, but so is being born into a Jewish family, except the new Jew has made a choice, one we should hasten and embrace.

Read more: http://forward.com/articles/199214/why-is-it-so-hard-to-convert-to-judaism/#ixzz33bwp2Vri

Anti-Muslim and Anti-Christian Frisco meeting by Global Hindu Heritage Forum in Dallas, Texas

      Comments Off on Anti-Muslim and Anti-Christian Frisco meeting by Global Hindu Heritage Forum in Dallas, Texas

The Title should have been opposite of Anti-Muslim or Anti-Christian, as it turned out to be not-anti-at all. But since it is a continum of the letter, we kept the same title.

http://nabsites.net/demo/anti-muslim-and-anti-christian-friscy/

An Alarming letter was posted by Global Hindu Heritage Foundation
and held an anti-Muslim and anti-Christian rally in Frisco, Texas – so I
went to the meeting. The agenda was not the same as it was in the
letter.

I think Indians in general and Muslims in
particular need to hear Madhu Kishwar, she will be in town through
Thursday in
New York. She threw me off with her perspectives, with a grain of salt
and skepticism, I did hear her full one hour talk. A critique turned
defender of Modi. A few notes for your to ponder upon. 

An alarming letter was posted by the Global Hindu Heritage Foundation at our
forum, DallasIndians@yahoogroups.com
. The letter was outright discriminatory, tearing India apart kind of letter, and
was sent to India’s newly elected Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi. The letter
was insane, and it was hard to believe that Indians living in America want to
discriminate and deny equal rights to Christians and Muslims in India. I just
could not fathom that most of the men on the list were Medical Doctors and
PhD’s.  The letter and my response to the
letter is at: http://foundationforpluralism.blogspot.com/2014/06/tearing-india-apart-hatefilled-mindset.html
 
 


The occasion  was the 7th Annual Hindu Unity Day in
Frisco. Unity of each community and Unity of communities must be
appreciated.  By the way, the first
Hindu Unity day
in Dallas was organized by the Foundation for Pluralism on
June 17, 2005 in Dallas.
I wanted to attend the event to understand what goes on.
A few years ago they had organized a summit on Islam – and I had asked them if
there was any Muslim on the panel, there was none, and they ignored my request
and perhaps passed judgments on Muslims without the presence of Muslims. It is
always good to be engaged and hear each other’s point of view; when it is about
the each other.

The speakers were Madhu Kishwar and Dr. Graham Schweig. The first
session
before lunch included several Dallas based organization heads talking
about
their efforts in campaigning for Mr. Narendra Modi, and I missed the
first speaker Kalyan Viswanathan, who might have delivered a negative
speech. I did
not hear Dr. Schweig’s speech as I had to leave.

Madhu Kishwar delivered a full hour’s speech “Modi and the Media – setting the
record Straight” – it was a pleasant surprise, there was no hatred spewing out
for Muslims or Christians. Usually fund raisers get people riled up against something
or someone to get people to open their check books, and a lot of people fall
prey for that. I have been to the fund raisers of right wing Jews, Christians and Muslims
as well, and have spoken up against their rhetoric.

Madhu Kishwar was rather inclusive in her approach.

Whenever she mentioned a positive statement about
inclusion of Muslims – people clapped out of their hearts. I have always believed that humans instantaneously react with goodness, it’s
only when they deliberate they get corrupted.   Indeed, in my
response to GHHF letter I had mentioned that a majority of the signatories on
that letter probably did not even read the contents and had simply signed it,
for a few to carry forward. It is hard for me to believe that
so many people in a group could subscribe to such vitriolic pronouncements,  and most of them would not have signed it, had they read it.

It was refreshing to hear her. She threw in a lot of information that I
need to verify and absorb.  It is always good to verify before you
believe, when the
information is different than what we have heard it all along.  I
ran into her again at the Sonu Nigam Show, and she assured me that her
reports are legitimate and said the Nanavati Report was accurate.

Some of her points:

She was bashing the media for not agreeing to the clean chit by SIT – to
me democracy exists because of the press, good, bad and ugly. There are
some great statements by Jefferson and others on the topic.

Do you realize, both the left and right have exactly same complaint? That the media in on other’s side.

She thinks – BJP was not convinced that Modi was not involved in the riots as
accused, that hesitancy was reflected in the talks and acts of BJP.

Per her Modi has done a lot of good things, but never flaunted it.


50% of Muslims Voted for Modi in Gujarat on February 24th
2002 results.

The hell broke loose within a couple of days – she asks, why would Modi
initiate riots when Muslims voted him so overwhelmingly?

28 Muslim Organizations headed by Kader Bhai in Rajkot had asked for a cemetery
plot which Modi had granted, and Modi never claimed or flaunted about it.

He is not divisive as claimed. Sab Ka Sath; sab ka Vikas has been his slogan from the very beginning.

I really liked when
she spoke my language – that is she will not accuse any one exclusively without
seeing the same mistake in others.  Referring
to Togadia, she said, Muslims are no exception; we have our own share of Danga-ee
(trouble makers).  It was not Modi that
needed the riots, but it was the Congress who needed it. (we have to assess this).

She claimed Army was called in immediately. And deployed on 3/1 – George Fernandez,
the then Defense Minister apparently toured the riot torn place on 2/28 while
the riots were still going on.  

I bought the book – but wont’t be able to read it, as I have to wrap up my book without any excuse.

Because
of the differences or dominance of Hindus, most  of  the Muslims,
Christians, Dalits and Sikhs have stayed away from being a part of India
based organizations.

All I ask Indian Muslims, Christians,
Sikhs and others to be involved with Indian organizations, we have to be
a part of the society, and all others have to be a part of our lives.
Otherwise, all of us would remain in shells not knowing what goes on, we
will be harming ourselves and our nation by not being a part of each
other. We have to live together, at least our relatives have to live
together in India and we need to care for all.

Mike Ghouse is an Indian American Public Speaker, thinker and a
writer committed to building cohesive societies and offers pluralistic solutions on issues of the
day.

Texas Faith – What does the decision by Southwestern Baptist to accept a Muslim student say about how one faith can reach out to another?

      Comments Off on Texas Faith – What does the decision by Southwestern Baptist to accept a Muslim student say about how one faith can reach out to another?

SHOULD BAPTIST SEMINARY ADMIT A MUSLIM STUDENT ??

God emphasized in Quran to “know each other”, and those who make that effort; he callled them the noblest. Jesus called them “Blessed are the peacemakers.” Indeed, every religion and every civil society organizes itself to create peace for the individuals and what surrounds him/her: life and environment. If we can learn to respect the otherness of others, and accept the God given uniqueness of each one of us, then conflicts fade and solutions emerge.

I would urge Southern Baptist Seminary President Paige Patterson to consider developing a teaching policy based on the essence of Jesus’ mission: peace on earth. If all religions can genuinely teach about other faiths to their students, the world would be a much better place.

Here is my fortnightly piece at Dallas Morning News:
http://nabsites.net/demo/texas-faith-what-does-decision-by/ 

# # #

What does the decision by Southwestern Baptist to accept a Muslim student say about how one faith can reach out to another?

By Wayne Slater | wslater@dallasnews.com | 1:33 pm on May 27, 2014 | Permalink
The decision by Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary to admit a Palestinian Muslim to the school’s Ph.D. archaeology program has stirred attention. For one thing, the decision was an exception to the seminary’s admissions policy. Southern Baptist seminaries have historically admitted those who intend to become Southern Baptist ministers. Churches send money to help pay for each student’s tuition. And the idea that churchgoers were sending their money to educate a Muslim student didn’t seem right in some quarters.

Seminary President Paige Patterson says the student is “a peace-loving man” who worked with other Southwestern students at the school’s archaeological dig in Israel and will abide by the school’s moral conduct requirements. He said non-Christians have been accepted in the past in rare cases with hopes they would convert.

Texas Faith contributor Jim Denison, a former faculty member and alumni of Southwestern, raises the issue on his website of religious exclusivity. “For a Baptist seminary to admit a Muslim student seems like the Republican National Convention inviting Bill Clinton to be its keynote speaker.  Both decisions would make headlines.”  http://www.denisonforum.org/cultural-commentary/1049-muslim-enrolled-at-baptist-seminary-why-is-this-national-news

All religious faiths are exclusive in one form or another. All have their rules, regulations and conventions. No question that Southwestern has the right to set the conditions for admission – and even the obligation to do so in furtherance of its religious faith. Denison asks a question: What’s the best way to engage people of other faiths?

The Southwestern decision raises some provocative questions: If it were a, say, Methodist seminary, not Southern Baptist, would it have been news? What if the student hadn’t been Muslim? When are a religious faith’s principles and guidelines helpful and when are they not? How should people of one faith engage people of another faith?
Texas Faith Panelists share their views, here is Mike Ghouse:
MIKE GHOUSE, President, Foundation for Pluralism and speaker on interfaith matters, Dallas

The discussion about why and how to engage people of other faiths becomes a good foundation to build upon cohesive societies, where none of us has to fear the other and continue living in peace. I am glad the issue of admission of a Muslim student at the Southwestern Baptist Seminary has come up; it’s a pivot for a positive change.

God created everything in harmony and set the matter aspect of the universe to be in balance – like the Jupiter, Moon and other items that function precisely on a trajectory in their own space. However, when it comes to humans, one of the other aspects of creation, God did not put us on auto-pilot. Instead, he gave us freedom and a brain to figure out such balance, maintain, and restore if lost.

Being the programmer of the universe, and because he intentionally created each one of us to be different, he knew we are bound to have conflicts and tear each other apart.  So he offered guidance to each tribe, community or a nation to preserve that harmony and live in peace.

The Quran is one such book of guidance and God says in verse 49:13 (Asad translation), “O men! Behold, we have created you all out of a male and a female, and have made you into nations and tribes, so that you might come to know one another. Verily, the noblest of you in the sight of God is the one who is most deeply conscious of Him. Behold, God is all-knowing, all-aware.”

God’s emphasis is on “knowing each other” and those who make that effort; he calls them the noblest among you.  Indeed, if we can learn to respect the otherness of others, and accept the God given uniqueness of each one of us, then conflicts fade and solutions emerge.

Jesus called on such individuals on the Mount of Beatitudes, “Blessed are the peacemakers.” Indeed, I would urge Seminary President Paige Patterson to consider developing a teaching policy based on the essence of Jesus’ mission: peace on earth.

If you trace the bloodshed, hatred and ill-will over the last 12 known centuries of conflict between Muslims and Christians, a few men among them have gone against the teachings of their own faiths. Indeed, more students of other faiths need to be admitted, not to convert, but to teach “blessed are the peacemakers” and the “noblest among you” and produce conflict mitigaters.

Note: I had a radio show called Wisdom of religion,
all the beautiful religions and the Dallas Baptist Seminary had called
me to let me know that they are recording it, and teaching it.

To read the views of other panelists please visit Dallas Morning News at:
http://dallasmorningviewsblog.dallasnews.com/2014/05/texas-faith-what-does-the-decision-by-southwestern-baptist-to-accept-a-muslim-student-say-about-how-one-faith-can-reach-out-to-another.html/#more-39668

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Mike Ghouse is a speaker, thinker and a
writer on pluralism, politics, peace, Islam, Israel, India, interfaith, and cohesion at work
place. He is committed to building a Cohesive America and offers
pluralistic solutions on issues of the day at www.TheGhousediary.com. He believes in
Standing up for others
and a book with the same title is coming up. Mike has a strong presence on
national and local TV, Radio and Print Media. He is a frequent guest on Sean Hannity show on
Fox TV, and a commentator on national radio networks, he contributes weekly to
the Texas Faith Column at Dallas
Morning News
; fortnightly at Huffington post; and
several other periodicals across the world. His personal site www.MikeGhouse.net indexes all his work
through many links.

 

Notes from watching Swearing in ceremony of PM Modi and his cabinet

      Comments Off on Notes from watching Swearing in ceremony of PM Modi and his cabinet

Notes made while
watching the Swearing in Ceremony of the PM and new Cabinet, it was a 90 minute
event. This is raw, no grammar or spell check done.

·        
Awesome event
·        
Congratulations to Prime Minister Modi and his
Cabinet
·        
I don’t know about you guys- the Indian National Anthem has always
made me feel tender and emotional, and frequently, I hear this version while
working late or when I want to get a break. 
·        
No Jai Hind after the national Anthem, even though I did not like
Indira Gandhi for her emergency rule – but her voice Jai Hind have been engraved
on my mind, I hear her every time, and usually, I am the one in gathering to say
it out loud – Jai Hind.
·        
It was good to see all people stand up for the National Anthem, of
course, as Americans we have opened up, but apparently the TV people made a
point about Nawaz Shariff standing up for the national Anthem.   
·        
 There is a false assumption
that one should not stand up for other nations National Anthems, the problem is
not with nations and the people – it’s the governmental policies. 
·        
This the only glorious moment of the President of
India
·        
Modi’s swearing in started the roll – I was really hoping that Modi
will take the oath, and then all of the ministers, together would take the oath
collectively. It was too long to hear the exact same words except their
names.
·        
It would have been nice for the President and Prime Minister to
speak 
·        
Swearing in was in Hindi and English – Venkaiah Nadu from Andhra
did it in English, followed by a few more including Najma Heptulla….. Ofcourse,
they could have done in of the 28 languages
·        
Uma Bharati walked out without bowing to the
President
·        
Good to see many women in the cabinet
·        
Men shook hands with the president, women did not. 
·        
Modi and someone leaned as if touching the
feet
·        
Most of them were around 62 – wonder what the median age
was
·        
Najma Heptulla is the oldest of all 74, born before independence 
·        
Smriti Irani is the youngest of all –
38
·        
Oddly, women’s age except Najma was not
displayed
·        
No western clothes were worn – except the shirt and pants by Mr.
Gowda
·        
As a pluralist I did not like the phrase “Sabhi prakar ke log” –
translates to all kinds of people, it should have been “every Indian” and not
all kinds of people. 
·        
When Sushma Swaraj came – Barkha started talking in her boisterous
voice- I have always liked her, but today I shouted her “Shut up Barkha” I want
to hear them.  They did not have the
sense to shut up. 
·        
Disappointments
o  
Too many Ministers, I was hoping Modi would cut the bureaucracy
down
o  
Nirmal Sitaraman should have been given the post of Public
relations – she did very well in defending and speaking in behalf of BJP and
Modi all these months.
o  
Najma Heptulla should not have been given the minority affairs
position, it should have been some oneelse who is aggressive and active in the
market.
o  
Too long – and a punishment of the guests to sit quietly… although
many of them were “desis’ and talking with each other. 
·        
Positive things
o  
Great moment, great ceremony
o  
Modi’s vision to be inclusive by inviting SAARC Nations, this is
good step forward
o  
Someone floated the idea of NAFTA – for Modi to do SAARC
deal
o  
It was good to see Rahul and Sonia in the audience – In a
democracy; we have to learn to accept defeat gracefully.
o  
None of the guests seem to have cell phones, and no one was
checking messages, it must have been a punishment to Salman Khan, he was
restless.
o  
Glad they kept the age to be below 75 for Ministerial
berths
These are the raw notes with no spell or grammar check

Mike Ghouse
www.MikeGhouse.net

Mr. Narendra Modi’s hypothetical India speech on Monday, May 26, 2014

      Comments Off on Mr. Narendra Modi’s hypothetical India speech on Monday, May 26, 2014

NARENDRA MODI’S HYPOTHETICAL INDIA SPEECH ON MONDAY 5.26.14

Mr.
Narendra Modi will deliver one of his most memorable speeches on Monday, May
26, 2014 upon taking the oath of office of the Prime Minister of India, and I
am going hypothesize the contents of his speech based on my embryonic understanding
of him firmed up over the last few weeks.   

MR. NARENDRA MODI, INDIA’S PRIME MINISTER

This is the biggest historic moment in the world
of governance. Never in the history of mankind, there has ever been an
individual freely elected to govern by such a huge mandate, the largest number
of people on the earth have voted Mr. Narendra Modi to lead the democratic
Republic of India.  On Monday, May 26,
2014, Mr. Modi will take the oath of office of the Prime Minister of India. The
theme of his speech would be simple: inclusive development.   

Mr. Narendra Modi’s hypothetical speech
on Monday, May 26, 2014

Published at Oped news at
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Mr-Narendra-Modi-s-hypoth-by-Mike-Ghouse-2014-Elections_Bharatiya-Janata-Party_Governance_Historicism-140525-136.html

Other articles of Modi at: http://mikeghouse.net/Articles/Narendra-Modi-India.asphttp://mikeghouse.net/Articles/Narendra-Modi-India.asp

Mike Ghouse is an Indian
American Public Speaker, thinker and a writer committed to offer pluralistic
solutions on issues of the day – wwwMikeGhouse.net
 # # #

Memorial Day Reflections

      Comments Off on Memorial Day Reflections
It is a day of remembrance and reflection, it is time to
pray for those have passed away, whether they are related to us or not. Let’s
take a few moments to remember all those who have influenced, affected and
cared for us, and those who cared for others whether we know them or not. It is
an act that enriches our souls and brings humility and connects us back with
ourselves.
 

Please do not wish “Happy Memorial Day” – it ain’t, it is rather a
day of reflection. Of course it may be nothing for you other than the weekend
to relax, and that is fine too.
 

You might find it meaningful to stop and say a prayer at one cemetery or the other, it is merely symbolic, and you don’t have to make an effort, just pull over on the road side of any cemetery and reflect on life for a few minutes.

 You don’t have to be religious to say a prayer – a prayer is merely “wishing goodness” to others. You may see it or not, we are all interconnected and the joy comes from seeing everyone connected is in harmony and peace. The idea of this prayer may be selfish, as we find ourselves some serenity.

If you could, please pray for our men and women who gave up their lives to defend our freedom and safety that we cherish. There is a joy that accrues to you by expressing gratitude.

My Grandfather had advised me to visit a cemetery or attend a funeral of a stranger to pay respects, and he added, for every wedding you attend, match it with attending a funeral or visiting a cemetery, he believed, it will straighten us out as humans, and I found that profound and enriching to the soul.

Of course, you pray for the beloved ones every day, but this is a special day, the national day of remembrance and it would be nice, if we as a nation pray for the well being of all.

I will take a few moments to remember all those who have influenced, affected and cared for me, and those who cared for others whether I knew them or not.

There is a beautiful all inclusive prayer that most Muslims say almost every day – the gist of which is ; Dear God forgive me, forgive my parents, my relatives, my friends, my community,  those who are alive, and those who aren’t. By the way when we seek forgiveness, we are suggesting to ourselves to find relief from all the burdens we carry in our day to day life and cherish a few peaceful moments. May we all be at peace, Amen!

Mike Ghouse is a motivational speaker and all his info is at www.MikeGhouse.net

Pakistan, China and Japan to receive high priority under Narendra Modi's foreign policy

      Comments Off on Pakistan, China and Japan to receive high priority under Narendra Modi's foreign policy

Modi has the passion to leave his
legacy, he wants to put his stamp on India. There is something about him that
makes him uncommon. This may be an euphoric call for him to follow the Raj
dharma – good governance.  As I have said
in an earlier note, he was waiting for this opportunity to re-set the course
for RSS and BJP away from fascist leanings to pluralistic pathways. He has the
mandate and he will do it right. 

The other day, after he received his letter from the President to form the government,
in a speech at the Parliament with BJP members, he said “he sets the record
ever time, he had not seen Vidhana Sabha of Gujarat until he was elected as CM,
and now he steps in to the parliament for the first time ‘after’ elected as the
PM. I went deep into that statement, reading into his passion to do unusual
things. 

Until after the campaign rhetoric was over, I really did not think he would
make a good Prime Minister, but in the last week or so, I have come to believe that
no one in India needs to fear the other (part of my definition of cohesive
societies ) and Modi has articulated that verbatim.

He will turn things around in foreign policy – he will find a place for India
in the UN Security Council, the first step is to have the ability to have good
relations with the neighbors to pave the way for that role, and he is going to
do that. He will breakthrough and establish newer relationships with our neighbors
and China.

Again, I am walking a thin rope with a faith, a new found nascent faith in
Modi. I connect with his words, his words are my words. I am really short on
time, but before Monday, I may write at least few notes and pass it on to my
friends, as I may not get the time to get it published in a paper, but it will
be on my blog.  I think 50% of my write
up would be reflected in Modi’s speech on Monday after his oath of office.
 
Mike Ghouse, is a Public Speaker, thinker and a
writer committed to offer pluralistic solutions on issues of the day.

# # #

Pakistan, China and Japan to receive high priority under Narendra Modi’s foreign policy 

A letter to my Prime Minister Shri Modi by Janab Ali Khan

      Comments Off on A letter to my Prime Minister Shri Modi by Janab Ali Khan

A letter to my Prime Minister Shri Modi by Janab Ali Khan
URL – http://nabsites.net/demo/a-letter-to-my-prime-minister-shri-modi/

Kudos
to Mr. Ali Khan for writing a thoughtful letter to the next  Prime
Minister of India, Shri Narendra Modi. As usual one of our right
wingers,  a Kiran Mehta see faults in it. Sadly,  
the hardcore right and left are incapable of seeing another point of
view but tearing up others – and of course their freedom must be valued
without having to agree. In a democracy, the best thing to do is respond
with a better answer. 

So, here is my response to Kiran Mehta’s five questions (at the very bottom of this entire note);

1.     
He said, very few people – that is Muslims of India, have the honor and
privilege of choosing their home land – compared to the 80% Hindu
majority who did not have that option of choosing.
 
2.     
He said, the new government will allow me to express my feelings of
patriotism in my own language – that is Jai Hind, as opposed to Modi’s
language he contrasted Bharat Mata ki Jai.
 
3.     
Muslims, Dalits, Christians and other do not want any appeasements,
handouts or favors, all they want is to have equal opportunities, access
and equal say. Thank God India is a democracy that allows every one the
freedom to speak  of which you and I are beneficiaries.
 
4.     
He addressed the specifics – to be treated like an Indian as guaranteed
in the constitution, but the right wing elements of India cannot see an
India together, like the goon Giriraj, who does not treat other Indians
as equals. Ali did the right thing by asking questions, that is the
right of every citizen.
 
5.     
Yes, Indian electorate has chosen development, and Muslims, Christians
and Dalits have also chosen Modi in the same percentages as the Hindus. 
Modi has the best answer for your question, he said, “whether you voted
for me or not, I represent you, and I am your prime Minister’.
 
All
Ali Khan letter must be admired, and I do hope that Mr. Modi invites
him to the inauguration and gives him a hug and assures him that every
Indian is his Bhai or Behan as he has repeatedly said.

What Ali
Khan did was fulfill the duty of a responsible citizen to point out the
flaws, so India can be flawless, that is Patriotism and we need to
reward this guy for writing such a letter. Indeed, a true patriotic
Indian is the one who takes the responsibility to tear down the
government policies, if they are wrong, no matter who they are, God,
Gandhi, Pundit Nehru or Narendra Modi.
  
More about Narendra
Modi at my website site MikeGhouse.net.  I am getting convinced Modi is
the right man to shape India’s rejuvenated destiny, when I read the
letters like this.

Mike Ghouse
Dallas, Texas

A letter to my Prime Minister
http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/counterflows/a-letter-to-my-prime-minister/