http://nabsites.net/demo/texas-faith-religion-and-right-to-free/
Freedom of Speech is understood in two different ways; one group believes that irresponsible statements must be controlled and censored by the government, whereas the other group believes in complete freedom of speech. It’s an alien idea for us, the Americans to imagine that Government can control free speech.
The hypocritical righteousness permeates in all religions; no one has a monopoly over it. This past week, I have become an Ambassador of American value in engaging with people from around the world in explaining the ultimate common good that freedom of speech facilitates. I used the phrase “Freedom of expression ultimately triumphs”, as a corollary to Mahatma Gandhi’s “truth ultimately triumphs”.
Please remember our suggestion must encourage people to consider replacing the old books with the new, they need to see the value in it.
the right to free speech
Mideast and North Africa has been fluid the last week, and no one knows how
exactly events will turn out. But it is clear that a clash of values is
sparking at least part of the conflict. As our editorial said last week, if not in Libya, then
certainly in Egypt and Yemen, we have seen yet another clash between religion
and free speech.
being defamed and believed that justified a violent response. The other side
believes that free speech protects even idiotic films.
time we’ve seen this kind of conflict. We saw it, for example, after a Danish
cartoon lampooned the Prophet Muhammad. And we probably will continue to see
this tension between religion and free speech.
is the question for discussion: If religion is about
ultimate values, doesn’t it stand to reason that some will see it as trumping
the right to free speech?
appropriate phrase in this particular context, it is just not the Muslims, but
the entire world differs with us on the value of freedom of speech. It’s an
American value and not necessarily a western or a Christian value.
become an Ambassador of American value in engaging with people from around the
world in explaining the ultimate common good freedom of speech facilitates. I
used the phrase “Freedom of expression ultimately triumphs”, as a corollary to
Mahatma Gandhi’s “truth ultimately triumphs”.
down the request to yank the film clip on Innocence
of Muslims from YouTube. I hope this sends a message to Muslim
nations that even the President of America cannot meddle with the freedom of
speech guaranteed in our constitution, a good solid enduring system of laws.
So, it is not America, it was the individual who made the movie. Most Americans,
including American Muslims have condemned the trailer and the idiot who made
it, but are willing to defend his right to the free expression.
of the state to protect her citizens, and if this is what it takes to save the
lives of Americans elsewhere, it may be considered as a short measure. In
long run, however, we must not compromise on free speech that is a God given
right and hallmark of civilizations.
restricting the freedom of speech, Europe is no exception. One of the most
common challenges I have encountered is restrictions placed on, and the
punishment prescribed for questioning the Holocaust.
ultimate values, doesn’t it stand to reason that some will see it as trumping
the right to free speech?
Indeed, if we lived in exclusive societies of a particular brand of Muslims,
Jews, Christians and others, their brand of religion would trump the right to
free speech. Thank God, America is God’s own country and diversity is an
anecdote to extremism.
and ill-will, the Mufti (chief clergy) of Saudi Arabia and the Brotherhood have
issued statements that it is un-Islamic to do harm to people and property in
the name of the prophet. The problem
with the Muslim world is they do nothing when problems erupt, but American
Muslims have responded instantly with advice and condemnation.
sustainable solutions to the clash of values.
Shamelessly Islamists like Maududi, Banna and others have cooked up
books that declare if someone insults the prophet, he can be killed. Over a
period of time, we have to replace those books systematically ( through mutual
agreements and consensus, no impositions).
ignorance, as Imam of the Ismaili Muslims; HH Aga Khan explains it in another
situation. In this particular situation what the Quraan and the Prophet call
for is different than it is practiced. A segment believes that if someone
insults the prophet, he should be killed, whereas the majority believe in
freedom of faith, the God-given freedom and believe killing one person is like
killing the whole humanity. The majority also believes that your mind your
business and I do mine.
the ones involved in the violence were less than a 10th of 1% of the
populace.
prophet and their religion. Quraan (5:32) is clear – Killing one person is like killing the
whole humanity, and saving one life is like saving the whole humanity. We need to get them and not others. Why
should a religion be responsible for your bad acts?
Prophet Muhammad said, “if you are unjust to a fellow being, Muslim or a
non-Muslim, by God on the Day of Judgment, I will stand against you and stand
up with the victim.” That was a strong warning that these criminals did not
heed.
Those who murdered Ambassador Christopher Stevens and his staff members, and those
who are vandalizing our embassies were purportedly defending the name of
Prophet Muhammad, but have done the exact opposite of their intention; tarnish
the name of the prophet.
prophet and their religion.
faith is a weekly column, where panelists from
different traditions respond to the issues of the day – for all the responses,
please visit Dallas Morning News at http://religionblog.dallasnews.com/2012/09/texas-faith-religion-and-the-right-to-free-speech.html/
– – – – – – –
paragraphs are an addition to what is in Dallas Morning News.